Friday, July 15, 2011
Friday, July 8, 2011
Learning from a Project “Post-mortem”
In 2008-2009, my school district at that time was in the process of adopting a new mathematics curriculum for the middle grades. The math content specialist of elementary, middle, and high school selected three programs that they conduct literature reviews, analyzed, and would align with the elementary and high school curriculums from past adoptions. The process that was communicated to math teachers of the middle schools was, teachers would pilot a variety of lessons from each of the three curriculums to gather information that would be communicated at delegated in-services to help gather information that would later be develop into a proposal for the school board at the end of the school year.
General Questions from the Project "Post-mortem" Review Questions
What was the single most frustrating part of our project?
As a three year teacher, the most frustrating part of the project of piloting the three curriculums to determining the best fit for the school district with the district, state and NCTM mathematics standards was the negative feelings and thoughts with the adoption process and having to pilot the three. I believe that this could have been simplified if the content specialists would have chosen three different standards where we could compare and contrast the three curriculums. Whereas it was a free for all and no structure which created frustration because most of the veteran teachers did not want change and refused to pilot the curriculums to participate in the adoption process effectively and efficiently.
Phase-Specific Questions
Phase I: How could we have improved our need-feasibility or analysis?
Prior to piloting the three curriculums, the math teachers were told on the first day of in-service at the beginning of the school year that they are to pilot lessons of the curriculums where we would collaborate about our experiences during certain in-service days throughout the school year. The timeline of the project could and would have been smoother and more effective if there was a plan, a timeline, and what needs and analysis did the content specialists, superintendent, and school board need to see and know to ensure that they would make the best choice of curriculum for the students, teachers, and district. Without having a plan or structure in place for the project creates much disorganized and negativity.
Overall, the adoption of the new curriculum could have been very successful and much more effective during the pilot process is a ID plan. The content specialists should have created an objective, what need to be analyzed and done by the teachers to provide the best information with a compare and contrast of the three curriculums. In addition, this would allow them to have a strong presentation for the school board and superintend with the literature review, teacher interaction, and feedback.